« Where can i find a kit to switch an automatic trans to a manual?
What’s the best place to print digital photos? »

How dangerous to health is the powerful X Ray scanner at Manchester airport?

I have noticed that people who give you an X Ray always hide behind a lead screen themselves.
Is this one the equivalent of being X Rayed 50 times in one go?
Never mind seeing my bum, what about my health, you bums?

It is well within the permitted limits and don’t forget you are fully dressed. One thing i’ve just thought of though - pregnant women - their babies will also be viewable and that might be a problem in a couple of ways.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 14th, 2009 at 4:20 pm and is filed under x. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

13 Responses to “How dangerous to health is the powerful X Ray scanner at Manchester airport?”

  1. You go through it for like a second, they’re round it all day… They just have to keep it on because they’re exposed to the rays more.

    If you had to get X-Rayed over and over, then it’d be quite bad. But as it’s in a Airport it won’t be life-threatening or hardly hurtful! :)
    References :
    Science.

  2. Another case of the government not looking before they leap.
    References :

  3. They go behind screens because they’re potentially taking hundreds of x-rays several days a week for years. That adds up to a massive amount of radiation.

    The health implications have been cleared, I wouldn’t waste your time worrying about them.
    References :

  4. no one is forcing you to fly
    References :
    if we were meant to fly, we would have wings of our own

    Praise God

  5. It is well within the permitted limits and don’t forget you are fully dressed. One thing i’ve just thought of though - pregnant women - their babies will also be viewable and that might be a problem in a couple of ways.
    References :

  6. see link below,
    detecting & preventing terrorism out-weighs the risk to the individual.
    For the greater good isn’t it better to risk a little, to save a lot?
    Or something like that.
    References :
    http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090923022547AA0AqSl

  7. taxed till i die,and then some. on October 15th, 2009 at 12:47 am

    No danger what so ever.
    References :

  8. I don’t know, if it’s still there next week I’ll use it, may as well give security a laugh !
    References :

  9. Lethal, it’s lethal. It’s been installed at the behest of Ryan Air and thier pals - see they sell you a ticket then ensure you are vaporised at the security point. They have your money, don’t have to provide a seat for you and auction off your checked luggage. Diabolical huh?
    References :

  10. current events Sans-culotte on October 15th, 2009 at 1:25 am

    the real reason why ronaldo left I can reveal he was afraid that his big headed ego would cause the radiation level would have been equal to the Iranian reactors to see through him
    References :

  11. I totally agree with you. It is seriously dangerous for the people who have to view these x rays.

    They would die from laughing if they saw my naked body!!!
    References :

  12. The whole "war on terror" is all a one world government lie, They are trying to poison bilions be through food addictives, bio-weapons and vaccines, food shortages etc

    The rothschilds and rockefellers etc like and are trying to do harm.

    http://jewishcrimenetworkdid911.blogspot.com/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BynB0yCN_4A&
    References :

  13. there isn’t a risk free dose of X-rays.
    References :
    there’s always some risk of mutating a cell and giving you cancer.

    Its only a matter of time before the operators sell the pictures to a web site. Like what happened with cctv

Leave a Reply